| To: | "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/6] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Sep 2016 07:56:22 -0700 |
| Cc: | david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <147216786073.525.16014208838990530622.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <147216784041.525.7722906502172299465.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <147216786073.525.16014208838990530622.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:31:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > Introduce XFLAGs for the new XFS reflink inode flag and the CoW extent > size hint, and actually plumb the CoW extent size hint into the fsxattr > structure. Just curious, but why would we even bother to expose the reflink flag to userspace? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/6] vfs: cap dedupe request structure size at PAGE_SIZE, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 4/6] fs: add iomap_file_dirty, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2/6] vfs: cap dedupe request structure size at PAGE_SIZE, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/6] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE, Darrick J. Wong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |