xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#834416: Acknowledgement (xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl fai

To: 834416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Bug#834416: Acknowledgement (xfs_growfs: XFS_IOC_FSGROWFSDATA xfsctl failed: Invalid argument)
From: Marcel Meckel <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 17:01:14 +0200
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=thermoman.de; s=20150622; t=1471273274; bh=GpBJYosWa5yOk+RnMjqPZ+6Bq8cnZ4sL0ecP11lnOck=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:From; b=dvyYIND7OUEM17MKX/RX7jp3+WDeId3lT0LY2F7fGCooPHt51N6h4nTt6QgFHhZBo T8NcqiCISFKfT8l6tjmEzxRrYMJBogV129VXVnGmRGa4f9awscmj9sH5ZyJq5jlrt6 wcyvUh8+ZzALiESPCYJZhLuQ/gGYZlevSCBzp0Jg=
In-reply-to: <handler.834416.B.147126595515716.ack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <e86b1937b452240cbe2457f6fdee8e9a@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <handler.834416.B.147126595515716.ack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Marcel Meckel <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, 834416@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: XFS Development Team <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:09:04 +0000
Resent-from: Marcel Meckel <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.834416.B834416.14712736082372@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Webmail
Just had a chat in #xfs on freenode and it might be that a
previous xfs_growfs under an older kernel didn't zero enough.

When I recall it correctly the XFS filesystem in question was
resized in the past under then stable Debian Wheezy (might even
have been resized under Debian Squeeze).

Chat for reference:

< bfoster> strange, seems like it is running a verifier on the
           secondary sb's
< bfoster> e.g., commit 1375cb65e, but that fix seems to go way back
< bfoster> did growfs run and fail prior to the run with these
           reported errors?
< thermoman> bfoster: never had problems before
< thermoman> but the FS might have been created with an older
             xfsprogs and it has been definately be resized before
< bfoster> or hmm, perhaps its remnants from a previous growfs
< bfoster> ok, I think that makes more sense, you went from 109 ags
           to 160 some odd ags
< bfoster> and grow/repair is complaining about ags below that
           109 threshold
< bfoster> which suggests the previous grows didn't zero enough,
           or whatever that old problem was
< bfoster> I think the kernel you're on now should "do the right thing"

Might be related:

http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_I.27m_getting_.22Internal_error_xfs_sb_read_verify.22_errors_when_I_try_to_run_xfs_growfs_under_kernels_v3.10_through_v3.12

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>