xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH xfsprogs 11/14] replace statvfs64 by equivalent statvfs

To: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfsprogs 11/14] replace statvfs64 by equivalent statvfs
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:57:03 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160809174158.GA4476@nyan>
References: <cover.1470555003.git.felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> <f4fc0b97ae8cdb30f1e0b0d55521f136877b33f5.1470555003.git.felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> <20160809074010.GM25647@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160809174158.GA4476@nyan>
User-agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 07:41:58PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote:
> This patch removes the usage of statvfs64 and thus one of the problems
> for Mac OS X. The other problem is solved by giving a suitable
> definition of f_brsize. Note that this might collide with other uses
> of f_brsize (if they exist). It might be cleaner to just check for Mac
> OS X in xfs_fsr.c.

Yes, that's probably better.  Or simply not build fsr on MacOS given
that there is no kernel XFS support anyway..

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>