| To: | XFS mail list <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Advice needed with file system corruption |
| From: | "Carlos E. R." <robin.listas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Aug 2016 14:40:26 +0200 |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <592673683.10446004.1470715375850.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <5787852A.7030900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160808161132.1d76eb5c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1470670691.8958.11.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160808174427.24d8272c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <592673683.10446004.1470715375850.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 |
On 2016-08-09 06:02, Gim Leong Chin wrote: > Drives connected to RAID controllers with battery backed cache should > have their caches "disabled" (they are really set to write through mode > instead). By the way, I found out in lab testing that 7200 RPM SATA > drives suffer a big performance loss when doing sequential writes in > cache write through mode.<http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs> If you disable the disk internal cache, as a consequence you also disable the disk internal write optimizations. It has to be much slower at writing. It seems to me obvious. -- Cheers / Saludos, Carlos E. R. (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/5] xfs: Propagate dentry down to inode_change_ok(), Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH xfsprogs] libxcmd: link against used libs, Mike Frysinger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Advice needed with file system corruption, Gim Leong Chin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Advice needed with file system corruption, Gim Leong Chin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |