| To: | Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill __uint*_t and __int*_t |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 9 Aug 2016 01:33:32 -0700 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160807173835.GA20839@nyan> |
| References: | <20160807173835.GA20839@nyan> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) |
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > Replace them by the more widely used uint*_t and int*_t. > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > This patch is essentially a global > 'sed -i "s/__\(u*\)int\([0-9]*\)_t/\1int\2_t/"'. The only other changes > are whitespace changes and removing the now unecessary type definitions. > > Running 'sed "s/^.//"' on the patch might be useful for checking that > I didn't mess up the indentation. If everyone is fine using (u)int*_t over s*/u* this looks good. I'd have a slight preference for s*/u* as in the rest of the kernel, but either way getting rid of our crazy __ types is a good thing. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 5/5] fs: Avoid premature clearing of capabilities, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs: Document error handlers behavior [V2], Carlos Maiolino |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] xfs: kill __uint*_t and __int*_t, Felix Janda |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: kill __uint*_t and __int*_t, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |