xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: Document error handling behavior

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Document error handling behavior
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:25:12 +1000
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160720090406.GA3094@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1468922657-3895-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <94b928aa-70f7-dbf4-66a8-a5f6ca2a4944@xxxxxxxxxxx> <c1db85e5-5537-0105-4fa5-4b6512333d96@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160720090406.GA3094@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:04:06AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:18:01PM -0700, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 7/19/16 2:15 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > On 7/19/16 3:04 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > >> This is the first try to document the implementation of error handlers 
> > >> into
> > >> sysfs.
> > >>
> > >> Reviews and comments are appreciated, please also notice I'm not 
> > >> english-native,
> > >> so, spelling corrections are also appreciated :)
> > > 
> > > Thanks for doing this! 
> > > 
> > > There seems to be a specific sysfs documentation format, see for example
> > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-ext4 
> > > 
> > > It might be better to follow that format, and refer to it after a brief
> > > explanation of the functionality in the xfs.txt file?
> > 
> > Or not; Dave doesn't like this location, so perhaps best not to take
> > my suggestion.  ;)
> 
> Oh, I can see now why he doesn't like that, I've never seen such directory 
> until
> you mentioned it, why should it be so hidden, and why should we split 
> filesystem
> information into different locations.
> 
> IMHO, if someone want to take a look into filesystem documentation, the person
> goes directly to Documentation/filesystems, I honestly think splitting
> information into two different directories are wrong, and, even though you 
> point
> to there in some other place, it is still bad, sounds like a RPG book... Start
> here...now go to page X...now go to page Y...now go to page Z.
> 
> I can re-format the documentation to the same format from sysfs-fs-ext4, but I
> believe keeping it under Documentation/filesystems is still the best to do. To
> be honest, I actually think we should create an XFS directory under it and put
> everything xfs related there.

I'd just add it to Doc/fs/xfs.txt right now, and we can work out
restructuring details later. Especially as we really need this documentation
added to the xfs-documentation repo (along with a "how to use"
guide). It's a similar situation to the libxfs code shared between
kernel and userspace, I think...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>