| To: | Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS? |
| From: | Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:49:29 +0100 |
| Cc: | Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <CAJCQCtRiznrWAmCEgd=uMETnBubh1ZttGP4xF9PLu0_j7XBRuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3ED34739A4E85E4F894367D57617CDEF9ED9518B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160704225226.GD27480@dastard> <20160705001854.GY12670@dastard> <3ED34739A4E85E4F894367D57617CDEF9ED955AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAJCQCtRiznrWAmCEgd=uMETnBubh1ZttGP4xF9PLu0_j7XBRuw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 14:34 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I understand that this is single thread Limit, but I guess there are some > > other Limit here, because even single thread creating 50W files speed > > is twice than 200W files. > > Watts or Wolframs (tungsten)? > > 50W!=50000. You could write it as 50k and 200k. It's unlikely to get > confused with 50K and 200K, which are temperatures, because of > context. But W makes no sense. > > > I suspect it's an abbreviation for the (Chinese) unit 'wan' https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Chinese-people-count-in-units-of-10-000 so it makes perfect sense but it's not an SI unit. -- Roger |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs mount hung on a corrupted filesystem, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ÐÑÑÐ ÐÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÑÑ ÑÐÐÐÑÐÐÐÐÐ, ÐÑÐ ÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐÑÑ ÑÐÐÐÑÐÐÐÐÑ |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS?, Chris Murphy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |