| To: | Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS? |
| From: | Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:34:49 -0600 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=colorremedies-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=RYB6J45jtF25GgBiSCiyX3rotB6F8tx47IEDcq+AEg4=; b=Awy81w7BiZYX46bthM5EmbZZqirR14VosYdceYbaKrZnTRR7evnWOgPILzz4ovoxMc MknUL8zX5An9zfUuqkkNfTJQAXokMF0ciLrG37efnTipUUlEC26phHsKLTHXC63MzmDs OHpi0Fa15JNmfBSSfNDaW+/oYthVEnjdNlMa0dkHyaztYu/pzOduIaKJc9nngI8EVUjR h3XH3prRMNiqUBFhePGsX6t+Y/5Fjf7OcFqzBa4GgdqS0Q0QpU5BiPeDW3WysUBw2JK6 Li1Wix9OBPvtUbrycdmSjoYcgdiYlmEQGScNeq8o3OayTpWwjSIDhSPqhaPeO6kjdRIM JibQ== |
| In-reply-to: | <3ED34739A4E85E4F894367D57617CDEF9ED955AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <3ED34739A4E85E4F894367D57617CDEF9ED9518B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160704225226.GD27480@dastard> <20160705001854.GY12670@dastard> <3ED34739A4E85E4F894367D57617CDEF9ED955AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Wang Shilong <wshilong@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I understand that this is single thread Limit, but I guess there are some > other Limit here, because even single thread creating 50W files speed > is twice than 200W files. Watts or Wolframs (tungsten)? 50W!=50000. You could write it as 50k and 200k. It's unlikely to get confused with 50K and 200K, which are temperatures, because of context. But W makes no sense. -- Chris Murphy |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question: Old Irix tape backup. Recovery on Linux (xfsdump/xfsrestore), Roger Willcocks |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | have you received my e-mail, violet |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS?, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS?, Roger Willcocks |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |