On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:21:42AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 01:02:34PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > When we're deleting realtime extents, lock the summary inode
> > in case we need to update the summary info. This prevents an
> > assert on the rsumip inode lock on a debug kernel.
> >
> > (Same idea as "xfs: lock rt summary inode on allocation".)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > index 97820c1..9c7227b 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> > @@ -5524,6 +5524,8 @@ __xfs_bunmapi(
> > */
> > xfs_ilock(mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> > xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> > + xfs_ilock(mp->m_rsumip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
> > + xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, mp->m_rsumip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
>
> These need a lockdep annotations, right? i.e.
>
> xfs_ilock(mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP);
> xfs_ilock(mp->m_rsumip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL|XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM);
>
> Because they are nested inside the inode ilock?
Yes, they do, as does the other _ilock(rbmip) in xfs_bmap_util.c.
Will send updated patch.
--D
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|