> On Jun 24, 2016, at 11:44 PM, Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:37:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> On 3/4/16 5:23 AM, Eryu Guan wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I noticed some xfstests failures while testing v4 XFS with latest
>>> v4.5.0-rc1 xfsprogs on v4.5-rc6 kernel, and all these failures are gone
>>> if I use v3.2.4 xfsprogs, or if test on v5 XFS.
>>>
>>> So either xfstests needs update or xfsprogs breaks something for non-crc
>>> XFS. But I'm not sure which is which, so I post them out for broader
>>> review.
>>>
>>> (All tests are checked with 'MKFS_OPTIONS="-m crc=0" ./check <sometest>')
>>
>> Eryu, sorry you didn't get a reply on this in March. We should have
>> listened! ;) The patches I sent in the pat day or two should
>
> Thanks for looking at them! :)
>
>> fix some of these ...
>>
>>> == 1. xfs/032 fsck failure (xfs_db check) on ppc64 host ==
>>
>> but not this one. Do you still see this?
>
> My recent test with 4.7-rc4 kernel and latest xfsprogs (June 22nd) shows
> xfs/032 passed on ppc64 host. But I'll retest to be sure.
I wasn't thinking. Brian's recent sparse inode patches fix this one.
Eric
|