xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch] xfs: don't allow negative error tags

To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] xfs: don't allow negative error tags
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 16:27:49 +0300
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <576D31B9.8010908@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20160624122234.GA23169@mwanda> <576D31B9.8010908@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:12:25PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> xfs_errortag_add() is called by xfs_file_ioctl(), which accept the 1st
> argument as signed, i.e,
> 
> typedef struct xfs_error_injection {
> __s32 fd;
> __s32 errtag;
> } xfs_error_injection_t;
> 
> Should we make it happy as well? Also, the typedef can be converted to
> to struct xfs_error_injection by removing the depreciated
> xfs_error_injection_t
> syntax if so.

That has been the user interface for a while so I didn't want to change
it.

regards,
dan carpenter

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>