| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs metadata overhead |
| From: | Danny Shavit <danny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:04:46 +0300 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zadarastorage-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=J0iPNra+g/vlKC5Ju1gxzbCRQbimekiMl2u6Xd5oCTM=; b=AoCp/mFLccsdmfwVC1clPEVndBW5cyMCs+VnHsRGVOybcXGKyYd7RYdmHPYOn/aADu L9fT+1WUOUJSExHYTHXdhI2vVnGNY3+zkBPRXvm+ltmUViMCr2Xa7k44qph0LW/3b2dg HtRQ3fdwck0rQ5d0yB4Y/wf0ZjXmKO8zs84qNu6s9TFcIkEwmxDxCOlHxG9qJsIQfSDZ dH/Pn12YiQr45lPBg/rRXW00Tvf630HlyvSKQCCYuqoS/lI7/jZ4nFqoq4TJrJonh61C OwC6yZpresOXnFBynMbDhRc9HaJSgRPvRFPzcQqViQCZNVDUXplU3GWWDXfx0ngUS5RM XxCw== |
| In-reply-to: | <20160622225117.GX12670@dastard> |
| References: | <CAC=x_0jDYb17Vh97Led7XXDiUMcUTJbpJ2Dw45gn=D0_w0K5VQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160622225117.GX12670@dastard> |
|
I see. We will try this direction. BTW: I thought that good estimate would be "volume_size - allocated_size - free_space". But it produced quite a difference compared to metadata dump size. Is there a specific reason? Thanks, Danny On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 06:58:16PM +0300, Danny Shavit wrote: Regards, Danny |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: fix locking for DAX writes, Boaz Harrosh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs_repair: resolve Coverity OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN, Bill O'Donnell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs metadata overhead, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xfs metadata overhead, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |