| To: | Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:06:55 -0700 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160617121604.GB23661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <146612627129.12839.3827886950949809165.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <146612628567.12839.3246258786290141903.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160617114117.GF19042@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160617121604.GB23661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:16:05AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > I'd take that a step further and suggest the entire series be split into > independent feature series, as appropriate. Yes, that's what I meant. I just didn't manage to get to the rest yet. > off the rmap bits for the time being. I'm just suggesting that if a > repost is required from this point forward for any of the logical > subunits (deps, rmap, reflink, scrub), I'd suggest to post, version and > changelog those units independently. Agreed. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | re:pigeon ring,bird ring manufactory directly from china, liguoyan2@xxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE, Brian Foster |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 002/119] vfs: support FS_XFLAG_REFLINK and FS_XFLAG_COWEXTSIZE, Darrick J. Wong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |