xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH 18/20] xfs/128: use $XFS_FSR_PROG instead of xfs_fsr directly

To: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH 18/20] xfs/128: use $XFS_FSR_PROG instead of xfs_fsr directly
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:47:55 -0700
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <146612796204.25024.18254357523133394284.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <146612796204.25024.18254357523133394284.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tests/xfs/128 |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


diff --git a/tests/xfs/128 b/tests/xfs/128
index 68f6f94..8758d7e 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/128
+++ b/tests/xfs/128
@@ -97,10 +97,10 @@ c14=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4)
 
 echo "Defragment"
 lsattr -l $testdir/ | _filter_scratch | _filter_spaces
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
-xfs_fsr -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this file
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the 
link
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the 
link
+$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this 
file
 _test_cycle_mount
 free_blocks3=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>