xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:44:34 +0800
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:DRBD DRIVER" <drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:XFS FILESYSTEM" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <575993EA.3010005@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1464615294-9946-1-git-send-email-ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <575993EA.3010005@xxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/30/2016 07:34 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset
>> try to prepare for the support and do two things:
>>
>> 1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(),
>> then we can drop the non-standard way for iterating bvec, which
>> can be thought as a good cleanup for lib/iov_iter.c
>>
>> 2) remove BIO_MAX_SECTORS and makre BIO_MAX_SIZE as obsolete, and
>> now there is only one user for each. Once multipage bvecs is introduced,
>> one bio may hold lots of sectors, and we should always use sort of
>> BIO_MAX_VECS which should be introduced in future and is similiar
>> with current BIO_MAX_PAGES.
>>
>> The only functional change is iterate_bvec():lib/iov_iter.c
>>
>> xfstests(-a auto) over loop aio is run for ext4/xfs to verify
>> the change and no regression found with this patchset.
>
>
> Added patches 1-7, still waiting for an answer on my reply to #8.

Thanks for adding patches 1-7, and now I just found the added
BIO_MAX_SIZE usage in dm-crypt.c is droped from next, so it is
safe to kill it now.

I will send a new patch #8 against for-4.8/core.

Thanks,
Ming

>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>