| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Internal error xfs_trans_cancel |
| From: | Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:29:29 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160602063539.GM12670@dastard> |
| References: | <ab487269-a423-e3dc-6f59-3dda004960c3@xxxxxxxxx> <20160601071047.GJ12670@dastard> <e80cee4f-1789-5418-ffa8-7551138bda0a@xxxxxxxxx> <0644b434-6cea-4188-9702-469c26d191b8@xxxxxxxxx> <20160602002653.GL12670@dastard> <af997005-e144-5509-885c-a688562ea3ec@xxxxxxxxx> <20160602063539.GM12670@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 |
> Hmmm, Ok. I've been running the lockperf test and kernel builds all > day on a filesystem that is identical in shape and size to yours > (i.e. xfs_info output is the same) but I haven't reproduced it yet. I don't know if that is important: I run the lockperf test and after they have finished I do a kernel build. > Is it possible to get a metadump image of your filesystem to see if > I can reproduce it on that? Sure, see private mail. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: _xfs_buf_ioapply: no ops on block 0x188e78/0x8 on vanilla 4.4.11, Holger HoffstÃtte |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Internal error xfs_trans_cancel, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Internal error xfs_trans_cancel, Thorsten Leemhuis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |