xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs

To: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH v6 0/8] block: prepare for multipage bvecs
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 21:34:28 +0800
Cc: linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, drbd-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:DRBD DRIVER), Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>, Joe Thornber <ejt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@xxxxxxxxx>, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>, NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxxx>, Sagi Grimberg <sagig@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx (open list:XFS FILESYSTEM)
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

Interests[1] have been shown in multipage bvecs, so this patchset
try to prepare for the support and do two things:

1) the 1st 4 patches use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec(),
then we can drop the non-standard way for iterating bvec, which
can be thought as a good cleanup for lib/iov_iter.c

2) remove BIO_MAX_SECTORS and makre BIO_MAX_SIZE as obsolete, and
now there is only one user for each. Once multipage bvecs is introduced,
one bio may hold lots of sectors, and we should always use sort of
BIO_MAX_VECS which should be introduced in future and is similiar
with current BIO_MAX_PAGES.

The only functional change is iterate_bvec():lib/iov_iter.c

xfstests(-a auto) over loop aio is run for ext4/xfs to verify 
the change and no regression found with this patchset.

V6:
        - rebased on v4.7-rc1
        - add reviewed-by tag
        - mark BIO_MAX_SIZE as obsolete instead of removing because
        dm-tree adds one usage now

V5:
        - use bvec's iterator to figure new base vec address and
        update 'skip' correctly
        - run xfstests(-a auto) on loop aio/dio for verifying
        the change in iterate_bvec(), and no regression reported
        - use stree-ng to trigger heavy swap over swapfile to verify
        change in iterate_bvec() too, looks everything is fine
V4:
        - make xfstests cover xfs
        - rebase on for-next of block tree
V3:
        - include kenrel.h & bug.h in bvec.h for fix comiling failure on arm
        as reported by 0day ktest
        - build test on arm & arm64

V2:
        - rename bvec_iter.h as bvec.h
        - always include bvec.h into blk_types.h as suggested by Christoph

V1:
        - don't move BIO_MAX_* to bvec_iter.h as pointed out by Christoph
        - run xfstests against v4.6-rc1-next-20160329
        - add Reviewed-by
        - for 1,4 and 5, Reviewd-by not added, Christoph still expressed
        'this looks fine to me.'


Ming Lei (8):
  block: move bvec iterator into include/linux/bvec.h
  block: move two bvec structure into bvec.h
  block: mark 1st parameter of bvec_iter_advance as const
  iov_iter: use bvec iterator to implement iterate_bvec()
  fs: xfs: replace BIO_MAX_SECTORS with BIO_MAX_PAGES
  block: bio: remove BIO_MAX_SECTORS
  block: drbd: avoid to use BIO_MAX_SIZE
  block: mark BIO_MAX_SIZE as obsolete

 drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h |  4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c              |  4 +-
 include/linux/bio.h           | 58 ++++----------------------
 include/linux/blk_types.h     | 22 +---------
 include/linux/bvec.h          | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/iov_iter.c                | 45 +++++++-------------
 6 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/bvec.h

-- 
1.9.1

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>