Re: [PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap files

To:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap files
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2016 01:24:23 -0700
Cc:	david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<146424225618.6278.13884344251723851779.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<146424222237.6278.4174636124436241002.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <146424225618.6278.13884344251723851779.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:57:36PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Since none of the current filesystems support reflinked swap files,
> make sure that we prohibit reflinking of swapfiles and swapon of
> reflinked files.

Ah, thanks.  I've actually prepared a patch to fix swapon in the kernel
and was about to start writing test cases for it.  I hope you haven't
also done the kernel work already :)

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount, (continued) [PATCH 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount, Darrick J. Wong [PATCH v2 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 3/7] xfs: test copy-on-write leftover recovery, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 3/7] xfs: test copy-on-write leftover recovery, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 4/7] xfs: test per-ag allocation accounting during truncate-caused refcountbt expansion, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: test per-ag allocation accounting during truncate-caused refcountbt expansion, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap files, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap files, Christoph Hellwig <= [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Christoph Hellwig Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Darrick J. Wong [PATCH v2 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 7/7] reflink: test changing sharers of a block while keeping refcount the same, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 7/7] reflink: test changing sharers of a block while keeping refcount the same, Christoph Hellwig question about xfs/122, Xiao Yang Re: question about xfs/122, Darrick J. Wong [PATCH 8/7] xfs/122: don't break on old xfsprogs, Darrick J. Wong

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 4/7] xfs: test per-ag allocation accounting during truncate-caused refcountbt expansion, Christoph Hellwig
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 7/7] reflink: test changing sharers of a block while keeping refcount the same, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 5/7] reflink: test interaction with swap files, Darrick J. Wong
Next by Thread:	[PATCH 6/7] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record, Darrick J. Wong
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]