On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 09:47:45PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> We should really collapse our 3 cvtnum variants,
> but for now at least shut up Coverity about this
> intentional case fallthrough.
>
Looks good
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361553
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361554
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361555
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1361556
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> index 955dcfd..12fe8f3 100644
> --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> @@ -3623,14 +3623,19 @@ cvtnum(
> switch (c) {
> case 'e':
> i *= 1024LL;
> + /* fall through */
> case 'p':
> i *= 1024LL;
> + /* fall through */
> case 't':
> i *= 1024LL;
> + /* fall through */
> case 'g':
> i *= 1024LL;
> + /* fall through */
> case 'm':
> i *= 1024LL;
> + /* fall through */
> case 'k':
> return i * 1024LL;
> default:
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
Carlos
|