Re: [PATCH 5/8] xfs: implement iomap based buffered write path

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>]

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 11:02:19AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Because the interface from the core iomap code need to pass the
> > length of the actually mapped range, and the amount of bytes successfully
> > written into it to the filesystem, as other filesystems will require
> > this for their locking.  We need to convert it back at some point,
> > and it seems more logical here than in the caller.
> > 
> 
> I'm not asking about the interface... or at least I'm not following your
> point. I'm just suggesting that the calculation of end_fsb is wrong.
> E.g., if the intent is to punch out the range that was allocated but not
> written to, shouldn't the range to punch be [offset + written, offset +
> length]?

Oh, yes.  It probably should - let me fix it and re-run xfstests..