xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io

To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] dax: handle media errors in dax_do_io
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:57:27 -0700
Cc: "jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx" <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jack@xxxxxxx" <jack@xxxxxxx>, "axboe@xxxxxx" <axboe@xxxxxx>, "linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-block@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=oTbrV0ZF+i7x+UFhUzBmVLPejEwXWxrjpOdmn2HFK/4=; b=oZeNNp/L0/vviLWBaSqHslAfO/C6qF5MXjeGH9N+RjHyBQ6QJ5z/Ch5nEftU/n8NyI UGKsd31LL8iku42c9SK35yWEhCMX0ziUZNs691gn/DnTodbw6h7h9wir55KM9LPcDBt5 xhnLo8FHzfY7uFANoxI5I2c/xxCbe/ePIfsn0vw4tidTQjP9VscEdgR/GNfyQHX1BLIV 53h3GaGOkdXnMJ180++H30FGQoCq3Mgh8EiE018QEeJ+Kv03NgLmANAiHebflAmKGDh5 UuyyExJF8wjpaj36mdj6r8uId9jAjYm9h4iH1CTKNTz1SRa6RfXl0BsNWfs+9qPko33p AzLQ==
In-reply-to: <1460741821.3012.11.camel@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1459303190-20072-1-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <1459303190-20072-6-git-send-email-vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> <x49twj26edj.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1460739288.3012.3.camel@xxxxxxxxx> <x49potq6bm2.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1460741821.3012.11.camel@xxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:37 AM, Verma, Vishal L
<vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 13:11 -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
[..]
>> >
>> > But, how does _EIOCBQUEUED work? Maybe we need an exception for it?
>> For async direct I/O, only the setup phase of the I/O is performed
>> and
>> then we return to the caller.  -EIOCBQUEUED signifies this.
>>
>> You're heading towards code that looks like this:
>>
>>         if (IS_DAX(inode)) {
>>                 ret = dax_do_io(iocb, inode, iter, offset,
>> blkdev_get_block,
>>                                 NULL, DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT);
>>                 if (ret == -EIO && (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE))
>>                         ret_saved = ret;
>>                 else
>>                         return ret;
>>         }
>>
>>         ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, I_BDEV(inode), iter,
>> offset,
>>                                     blkdev_get_block, NULL, NULL,
>>                                     DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT);
>>         if (ret < 0 && ret != -EIOCBQUEUED && ret_saved)
>>                 return ret_saved;
>>
>> There's a lot of special casing here, so you might consider adding
>> comments.
>
> Correct - maybe we should reconsider wrapper-izing this? :)

Another option is just to skip dax_do_io() and this special casing
fallback entirely if errors are present.  I.e. only attempt dax_do_io
when: IS_DAX() && gendisk->bb && bb->count == 0.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>