xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe

To: Brent Bice <bbice@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xfs: xfs_inode_free() isn't RCU safe
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 07:11:48 +1000
Cc: Alex Lyakas <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Shyam Kaushik <shyam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <570CDC0B.3070802@xxxxxxx>
References: <0A92B65A3BF94F60BB36EA3FA716DF1F@alyakaslap> <570CDC0B.3070802@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 05:29:15AM -0600, Brent Bice wrote:
>    Could you resend it to be sure? I flagged it for redelivery the
> day I emailed you so if nobody else has seen it yet then something
> still didn't work.  I was pretty sure I'd seen it get delivered ok
> to oss, but... (shrug)

No, it didn't, and it's not in the archives, either.

It seems that sgi.com is rejecting quite a bit of legitimate mail
lately. I've seen a couple of people in the past couple of weeks
send stuff that has reached my private in boxes but not the list.
Now this one, too.

If someone is having to micro-manage the list to prevent rejections
of valid email then that is bad...

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>