| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 15/19] mkfs: don't treat files as though they are block devices |
| From: | Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:56:58 +0200 |
| Cc: | xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <5707D35E.7070703@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1458818136-56043-1-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> <1458818136-56043-16-git-send-email-jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx> <5706FA7C.7020103@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CACj3i73JEzCj-4kp3=H9mjXCKYgcOUYCOyq-aZSWZFXUih+0MA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5707D35E.7070703@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
It seems I misunderstood some things about what âhappens/what should happen with files. :-) I will see what happens with the tests, what difference in the results is with this patch in the original version. âCheers, Janâ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 09/19] mkfs: use getnum_checked for all ranged parameters, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/6 v2] xfs: xfs_iflush_cluster vs xfs_reclaim_inode, Brian Foster |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 15/19] mkfs: don't treat files as though they are block devices, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 15/19] mkfs: don't treat files as though they are block devices, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |