xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: What is the meaning of XLOG_MIN_RECORD_BSIZE? (Missing a check?)

from [Jan Tulak] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What is the meaning of XLOG_MIN_RECORD_BSIZE? (Missing a check?)
From: Jan Tulak <jtulak@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:38:17 +0100
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160221231815.GD25832@dastard>
References: <CACj3i70osVyt=QTTqoqKGttwNC8w7Gtq479-Nk-icQrDn83hCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160219154347.GA27263@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACj3i72wijiApA0gD0mRrMvPomDC5pEAr1Mvv6e3vi4HU1S_sw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160219162913.GC27263@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160221231815.GD25832@dastard>
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Keep in mind that a value of 0 in the superblock is completely
acceptible, in which case the kernel treats the log stripe unit as
being a single sector (i.e. same as a v1 log). See, for example,
xlog_sync() where it works out the padding to use for the log buffer
write.

âGood to know. :-)

Cheers,
Janâ
Â

--
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH 1/3] quota: Add support for ->get_nextdqblk() for VFS quota, Jan Kara
Next by Date:  Re: [lkp] [xfs] fbcc025613: -5.6% fsmark.files_per_sec, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:  Re: What is the meaning of XLOG_MIN_RECORD_BSIZE? (Missing a check?), Dave Chinner
Next by Thread:  test - please ignore, Troy McCorkell
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]