Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset

To:	"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 01:56:46 -0800
Cc:	david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to:	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20160215204614.7977.2848.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20160215204608.7977.2802.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160215204614.7977.2848.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent:	Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:46:14PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> "Invalid argument" is a better response to an impossibly high offset
> dedupe request than "extents don't match", so change the test.

What does btrfs return here?

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH v4.3 0/3] xfstests: minor fixes for the reflink/dedupe tests, Darrick J. Wong [PATCH 2/3] punch-alternating: use the block size reported by the fs for punching, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 2/3] punch-alternating: use the block size reported by the fs for punching, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset, Christoph Hellwig <= Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset, Filipe Manana Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset, Christoph Hellwig [PATCH 3/3] xfs/24[356]: check for -c switch to xfs_io bmap command, Darrick J. Wong Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs/24[356]: check for -c switch to xfs_io bmap command, Christoph Hellwig

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH 11/15] xfs: move v1 inode conversion to xfs_inode_from_disk, Dave Chinner
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH 2/3] punch-alternating: use the block size reported by the fs for punching, Christoph Hellwig
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset, Darrick J. Wong
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH 1/3] generic/304: fix high offset, Filipe Manana
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]