| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 12/15] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:35:06 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1455693652-3899-13-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1455693652-3899-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1455693652-3899-13-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
> index 685c7a7..1408be3 100644
> --- a/libxfs/libxfs_api_defs.h
> +++ b/libxfs/libxfs_api_defs.h
> @@ -108,4 +108,8 @@
>
> #define xfs_verify_cksum libxfs_verify_cksum
>
> +/* inode link counts */
> +#define set_nlink(inode, nlink) ({ (inode)->i_nlink = (nlink); })
> +#define inc_nlink(inode) (inode)->i_nlink++
Can we defines these as inlines?
> + ip->i_vnode.i_nlink++; /* account for . */
Shouldn't we use VFS_I() like everywhere else?
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/15] xfs: move v1 inode conversion to xfs_inode_from_disk, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/15] xfs: move v1 inode conversion to xfs_inode_from_disk, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 12/15] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 12/15] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |