xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 12/15] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] xfs: use vfs inode nlink field everywhere
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 23:35:06 -0800
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1455693652-3899-13-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1455693652-3899-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1455693652-3899-13-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
> index 685c7a7..1408be3 100644
> --- a/libxfs/libxfs_api_defs.h
> +++ b/libxfs/libxfs_api_defs.h
> @@ -108,4 +108,8 @@
>  
>  #define xfs_verify_cksum             libxfs_verify_cksum
>  
> +/* inode link counts */
> +#define set_nlink(inode, nlink)      ({ (inode)->i_nlink = (nlink); })
> +#define inc_nlink(inode)     (inode)->i_nlink++

Can we defines these as inlines?

> +             ip->i_vnode.i_nlink++;          /* account for . */

Shouldn't we use VFS_I() like everywhere else?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>