xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/14] xfsprogs: kernel libxfs sync up to 4.5-rc2

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] xfsprogs: kernel libxfs sync up to 4.5-rc2
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:19:56 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1455517105-20033-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1455517105-20033-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 05:18:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> This patchset pulls xfsprogs lixfs up to the same base code as the
> v4.5-rc2 kernel. I've simply pulled the commits across and in each
> patch made the external xfsprogs changes necessary to make them
> compile and work correctly. This applies on top of the xfs_io dax
> patchset I posted a short while ago. I've left all the kernel
> sign-offs on the commits - it's really only the patches that change
> stuff outside libxfs that need any sort of review...
> 
> This is pretty much all of the remaining changes needed before I can
> cut a 4.5.0-rc1 release of xfsprogs - it's really only bug fixes and
> minor changes from here, as I really need this base tree mostly
> stable from here on.
> 
> The reason for that I'm now going to be build a for-next branch off
> this that has all the changes in the current kernel for-next branch.
> This will enable Darrick to have a sane code base that he can rebase
> all his xfsprogs changes for rmap/reflink on top of. That will make
> review, testing and eventual merge much easier for everyone.
> 

A couple nits to follow that don't warrant a resend. So, for the series:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

> -Dave.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>