| To: | Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: richacl(7) man page review comments |
| From: | "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:27:44 +0100 |
| Cc: | mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Developers <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>, lkml <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Linux API <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bWXqcDFtT2vzZbBE1pbUexw6z1090ZYpabhVFB8G/tU=; b=lNX9DeuYPbl72BNE9WYBSRFwrcjU1RuR/iUtPzddoqM5AfAqVLxRHAzJ1jkE25Y0R9 6Rn2VB7bydqFhVdq/mPTmT3xeX+RW+mTjh5LcqQiknQbV7XhnpHP0RSeWw5yvVNwjFyo dZq/C+EHv/y9WYl8SiwVQtvO4ddvDw2txJXnV6ets/voTFR6/mXUUK9WgcKOR1U8GNkW AHtPGBf9dSlv5hI64Fh4AEepybdiNQMyylaJqWA9BCFWVTaZdUKFfrP6kdHs1n3WqtoB 893//+wBj2sEFXZ6OJPPe8PP4Ctv6lIlGT87uaGIJ7OyiMOaMlBMOG87Ji/UfqJFhXRd W1xg== |
| In-reply-to: | <CAHc6FU5__xbKm4mg8+fK_ZW5ZYsDoQcYBBvQg573Eq4ERDsROw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56B770B6.7040803@xxxxxxxxx> <56B77262.7090107@xxxxxxxxx> <CAHc6FU5__xbKm4mg8+fK_ZW5ZYsDoQcYBBvQg573Eq4ERDsROw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
On 02/12/2016 11:25 PM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) > <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Andreas, >> >> I'll probably have quite a few more comments on this page as I get to >> understand RichACLs better. Here's some comments from an initial >> reading. > > thanks a lot for all the feedback to the man-pages. I've more or less > made all the suggested changes but didn't get to adding examples yet > (that's not so easy). > > The changes are here: > > https://github.com/andreas-gruenbacher/richacl Thanks. I'll send a few further comments. But I hope to send more in the future. >> So, an initial comment. It seems to me to that this page (but >> not setrichacl(1) and getrichacl(1)) should ultimately land in >> man-pages (just like acl(7)), since we're talking about a kernel >> feature. Make sense? > > We could sure move acl(5) and richacl(7) there. We already have acl(5) (now "acl(7)" in man pages) ;-). Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: block allocations for the refcount btree, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: setrichacl(1) man page review comments, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: richacl(7) man page review comments, Andreas Gruenbacher |
| Next by Thread: | Re: richacl(7) man page review comments, Andreas Gruenbacher |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |