| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Feb 2016 03:31:26 -0800 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1455094043-9694-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1455094043-9694-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1455094043-9694-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
> + struct xfs_writepage_ctx wpc = {
> + .io_type = XFS_IO_OVERWRITE,
> + };
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = xfs_do_writepage(page, wbc, &wpc);
> + return xfs_writepage_submit(&wpc, wbc, ret);
> +}
> +
> +STATIC int
> xfs_vm_writepages(
> struct address_space *mapping,
> struct writeback_control *wbc)
> {
> + struct xfs_writepage_ctx wpc = {
> + .io_type = XFS_IO_OVERWRITE,
> + };
Shouldn't we start out with an invalid (0) state, and just move
the actual states up to start from 1?
Otherwise looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/8] xfs: remove xfs_cancel_ioend, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfs: don't chain ioends during writepage submission, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 3/8] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 3/8] xfs: Introduce writeback context for writepages, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |