Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: guard fsxattr definition for newer kernels

[Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/9/16 1:55 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 11:40:57AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> After 334e580,
>> fs: XFS_IOC_FS[SG]SETXATTR to FS_IOC_FS[SG]ETXATTR promotion
>>
>> the file include/linux/fs.h now defines struct fsxattr.
>>
>> It defines FS_IOC_FSGETXATTR as well, so use that to wrap
>> our local definition, and skip it if the kernel is providing
>> it so that we don't get multiple definitions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Should the kernel also #define HAVE_FSXATTR to help existing
>> xfsprogs-devel installations?
>>
>> (And what if headers are included in the other order?  Should
>> we try to guard on the kernel side or no?)
> 
> I've already sent a patch to fix this - it was with the foreign
> filesystem xfs_quota patch....

Oh, sorry, spaced it.

What do you think of the HAVE_FSXATTR definition in fs.h?

-Eric