| To: | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dax: pass bdev argument to dax_clear_blocks() |
| From: | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 7 Feb 2016 10:19:29 -0800 |
| Cc: | "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Alexander Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux MM <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS Developers <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=l90sa513N7j8emNvplZ7DDZ3GVGEAyl8jywwC5YIWew=; b=rGMd4YpgcBsltfNhKCWTxDdOLJGjaKPoB/KyXJylnb2ZkIiL25O/bZtkKs4k2h8FfY uI6PnRFc38CPjbNLd3M+ttl5e3Dl3gzcprbZov0NZ8D36r1JtxF4RFjJjqZ5UHvzPotO OvHjo3HwcZV/RUTA9pKRrbi+P3eEiT4ht8Lc9vMJ7ucZCZ+5Xs3Vb+FGp1/BrRTOjyCK xw19xlMIB3IQGwkDT5oHtFQ29ehiq/bsxzFEUFo3Kdm6V4DgEXoUDQS74JbRdOI8ccY0 sHvxEzXL2v5nocGZ1H+TjUiZoTVvOkpJyex/WEORVwz1gAyqs60K3KmSeXj9uktY7amV iSMg== |
| In-reply-to: | <1454829553-29499-2-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1454829553-29499-1-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1454829553-29499-2-git-send-email-ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > dax_clear_blocks() needs a valid struct block_device and previously it was > using inode->i_sb->s_bdev in all cases. This is correct for normal inodes > on mounted ext2, ext4 and XFS filesystems, but is incorrect for DAX raw > block devices and for XFS real-time devices. > > Instead, have the caller pass in a struct block_device pointer which it > knows to be correct. > > Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/dax.c | 4 ++-- > fs/ext2/inode.c | 5 +++-- > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +- > fs/xfs/xfs_aops.h | 1 + > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 4 +++- > include/linux/dax.h | 3 ++- > 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c > index 227974a..4592241 100644 > --- a/fs/dax.c > +++ b/fs/dax.c > @@ -83,9 +83,9 @@ struct page *read_dax_sector(struct block_device *bdev, > sector_t n) > * and hence this means the stack from this point must follow GFP_NOFS > * semantics for all operations. > */ > -int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long _size) > +int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct block_device *bdev, > + sector_t block, long _size) Since this is a bdev relative routine we should also resolve the sector, i.e. the signature should drop the inode: int dax_clear_sectors(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, long _size) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: getrichacl(1) man page review comments, Martin Steigerwald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: move writeback calls into the filesystems, Dan Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2] dax: pass bdev argument to dax_clear_blocks(), Ross Zwisler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] dax: pass bdev argument to dax_clear_blocks(), Ross Zwisler |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |