xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type V3

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Split default quota limits by quota type V3
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:22:38 +1100
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160201095707.GB8141@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1454000266-22541-1-git-send-email-cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> <56AA51B7.7030403@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160201095707.GB8141@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:36:55AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > On 1/28/16 10:57 AM, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> > >           xfs_disk_dquot_t        *ddqp = &dqp->q_core;
> > >  
> > > -         /*
> > > -          * The warnings and timers set the grace period given to
> > > -          * a user or group before he or she can not perform any
> > > -          * more writing. If it is zero, a default is used.
> > > -          */
> > 
> > Not sure why you removed this comment?
> > 
> Regarding this comment, I think it's just redundant with the previous 
> comment, I
> left it in the code for the V4 though, I believe Dave can rip it off if it is
> really redundant.

No, please don't ask me to do make random patch edits on commit -
it's your job as a patch submitter to get it right. I will sometimes
do this for simple patches or patches that come from a
never-seen-before-and-never-seen-again patch submitter, but for a
regular developer submitting non-trivial patches I won't change the
patches because the issue hasn't been sorted out during peer review.

Work it out with Eric, get a reviewed-by tag, and I'll apply it as
reviewed.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>