| To: | Christian Affolter <c.affolter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Random write result differences between RAID device and XFS |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 30 Jan 2016 09:25:53 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <56AB44AF.8020807@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <56AB44AF.8020807@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:53:35AM +0100, Christian Affolter wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to understand the differences of some bandwidth and IOPs test > results I see while running a random-write full-stripe-width aligned fio > test (using libaio with direct IO) on a hardware RAID 6 raw device > versus on the same device with the XFS file system on top of it. > > On the raw device I get: > write: io=24828MB, bw=423132KB/s, iops=137, runt= 60085msec > > With XFS on top of it: > write: io=14658MB, bw=249407KB/s, iops=81, runt= 60182msec Now repeat with a file that is contiguously allocated before you start. And also perhaps with the "swalloc" mount option. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: introduce per-inode DAX enablement, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | real-time device BUG, Ross Zwisler |
| Previous by Thread: | Random write result differences between RAID device and XFS, Christian Affolter |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Random write result differences between RAID device and XFS, Christian Affolter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |