On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:21:45PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> It looks like the current version of xfsprogs (v4.3.0) has an inconsistency
> between its documentation and implementation that is making the xfstest
> xfs/293 fail:
>
> ./check xfs/293
> FSTYP -- xfs (debug)
> PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 lorwyn 4.5.0-rc1
> MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/pmem0p2
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o dax -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/pmem0p2
> /mnt/xfstests_scratch
>
> xfs/293 - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad)
> --- tests/xfs/293.out 2015-10-02 10:19:36.836796097 -0600
> +++ /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad 2016-01-29
> 10:41:25.530512911 -0700
> @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
> QA output created by 293
> Silence is golden
> +help not documented in the xfs_io manpage
> +zero not documented in the xfs_io manpage
> ...
> (Run 'diff -u tests/xfs/293.out /root/xfstests/results//xfs/293.out.bad'
> to see the entire diff)
> Ran: xfs/293
> Failures: xfs/293
> Failed 1 of 1 tests
>
> "help" and "zero" are indeed options in xfs_io, but aren't listed in the man
> page.
Commit 270dae6c0b41d855729fec73f94f33665bd36349 in xfsprogs for-next fixes
this.
--D
>
> Thanks,
> - Ross
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
|