On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 05:09:23PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Pull another 4 bytes out of the xfs_icdinode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.c | 8 ++++----
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_inode_buf.h | 1 -
> fs/xfs/xfs_export.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 5 +----
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode_item.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c | 1 -
> fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
...
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> index c424d4b..397ce85 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c
> @@ -1227,7 +1227,6 @@ xfs_setup_inode(
> break;
> }
>
> - inode->i_generation = ip->i_d.di_gen;
> i_size_write(inode, ip->i_d.di_size);
> xfs_diflags_to_iflags(inode, ip);
>
Same question here wrt to reclaimable inodes as the previous patch and
nlink..? Seems Ok otherwise.
Brian
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> index cfb6527..6162e65 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_itable.c
> @@ -100,11 +100,11 @@ xfs_bulkstat_one_int(
> buf->bs_mtime.tv_nsec = inode->i_mtime.tv_nsec;
> buf->bs_ctime.tv_sec = inode->i_ctime.tv_sec;
> buf->bs_ctime.tv_nsec = inode->i_ctime.tv_nsec;
> + buf->bs_gen = inode->i_generation;
>
> buf->bs_xflags = xfs_ip2xflags(ip);
> buf->bs_extsize = dic->di_extsize << mp->m_sb.sb_blocklog;
> buf->bs_extents = dic->di_nextents;
> - buf->bs_gen = dic->di_gen;
> memset(buf->bs_pad, 0, sizeof(buf->bs_pad));
> buf->bs_dmevmask = dic->di_dmevmask;
> buf->bs_dmstate = dic->di_dmstate;
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
|