xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/7 V3] quota: add new quotactl Q_GETNEXTQUOTA

To: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 V3] quota: add new quotactl Q_GETNEXTQUOTA
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:04:32 -0600
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20160125150710.GN24938@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1453487136-12681-1-git-send-email-sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160125150710.GN24938@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
On 1/25/16 9:07 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 22-01-16 12:25:29, Eric Sandeen wrote:

...

> So I've taken patch 1/7 into my tree since that is completely independent.
> Patches 2/7 and 3/7 look mostly good to me (except for that small omission
> in 3/7) so I can take them to my tree as well. Once I'll finish testing
> some UDF changes I have pending I'll push the tree to:

Jan, thanks for catching & fixing those issues.

> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git for_next
> 
> and Dave can pull from there to have a basis for XFS patches. I want to
> implement Q_GETNEXTQUOTA for VFS quota formats as well and those will go
> through my tree so that's why I want the interface changes go via my tree.

Makes sense to me.

Thanks,
-Eric

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>