Re: [PATCH 0/4] quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETQUOTA2

[Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon 18-01-16 09:18:16, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 1/18/16 4:33 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 15-01-16 11:31:00, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> >> For a purpose-built interface of "find the next ID" that wouldn't require 
> >> any
> >> structure or interface changes...
> >>
> >> We could name it Q_GETNEXTQUOTA / Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA to make it explicit about
> >> the purpose, and document that return behavior.  Done & done.  ;)
> >>
> >> A new grand unified extensible quota call sounds like a great idea, I just
> >> hate to gate this work on designing a brand-new interface.
> > 
> > OK, ok. I like Dave's proposal for quotactl2(). So let's leave the 
> > unification
> > for later and implent Q_GETNEXTQUOTA and Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA with the
> > functionality of your original Q_XGETQUOTA2. Having separate call to get
> > next ID would save us one new quotactl but OTOH we would need two syscalls
> > (and quota structure lookups) to report one structure and there are
> > potentially *lots* of them.
> 
> Ok, I can re-do it with the new Q_[X]GETNEXTQUOTA names, I've already done
> the non-xfs one as well, just starting testing on that.
> 
> With or without the flags argument?

Without. For further extensibility I'd really go for the unified API in the
end.

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR