| To: | Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/4] quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETQUOTA2 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 18 Jan 2016 03:00:46 -0800 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivered-to: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20160118103302.GD6850@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <568FEA2C.6080708@xxxxxxxxxx> <20160109072600.GA21636@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20160111132617.GD6262@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5693D33A.5090307@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160111162807.GK6262@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5696D27A.9070700@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160115093507.GA15950@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56992CD4.6030408@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20160118103302.GD6850@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 11:33:02AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > OK, ok. I like Dave's proposal for quotactl2(). So let's leave the unification > for later and implent Q_GETNEXTQUOTA and Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA with the > functionality of your original Q_XGETQUOTA2. Having separate call to get > next ID would save us one new quotactl but OTOH we would need two syscalls > (and quota structure lookups) to report one structure and there are > potentially *lots* of them. Oh well. Guess I should give in and just accept the original patch.. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/4] quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETQUOTA2, Jan Kara |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfsprogs: misc uClibc patches: remove aio.h check from configure, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/4] quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETQUOTA2, Jan Kara |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/4] quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETQUOTA2, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |