On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:46:40PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:02:36AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > > As I've pointed out previously to Darrick: xfstests:/tests/xfs/122
> > >
> > > Make that build again, update it.
> > >
> > Oh, I went looking for that and missed it somehow, thought it had been
> > removed. Ok then!
>
> The real issue is that build environment change alignments. 32 vs 64
> bit builds are obvious, but on some architectures different ABIs have
> different alignments (we had some fun with ARM in that regard),
> nevermind the equivalents to IRIX n32 popping up everywhere these days
> that make things complicated.
>
> I'd really love to have Darrick's check in xfs_format.h as an opt-in
> if a build time assert is provided - that way every user can check it
> doesn't screw up the structures.
I've fixed xfs/122, so I suppose we no longer need this to end up in
xfsprogs. The kernel-side patch can stick around in fs/xfs/ without
touching libxfs.
(New patches out soonish.)
--D
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
|