xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] linux.h: Use off64_t instead of loff_t
From: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 21:00:01 +0100
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <cover.1452627740.git.felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <cover.1452627740.git.felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
These are equivalent on glibc, while musl does not know loff_t.

In the long run, it would be preferable to enable transparent LFS so
that off64_t could be replaced by off_t.

Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux.h b/include/linux.h
index 827dbe1..4872a1e 100644
--- a/include/linux.h
+++ b/include/linux.h
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ platform_discard_blocks(int fd, uint64_t start, uint64_t 
len)
 #define EFSCORRUPTED   EUCLEAN /* Filesystem is corrupted */
 #define EFSBADCRC      EBADMSG /* Bad CRC detected */
 
-typedef loff_t         xfs_off_t;
+typedef off64_t        xfs_off_t;
 typedef uint64_t       xfs_ino_t;
 typedef uint32_t       xfs_dev_t;
 typedef int64_t        xfs_daddr_t;
-- 
2.4.10

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>