xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: create helper for bmap finish & trans join in attr c

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: create helper for bmap finish & trans join in attr code
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:58:40 +1100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <56465643.5070504@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56441B8E.6070603@xxxxxxxxxx> <5644BEF8.6070201@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20151112165801.GA14854@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151112201231.GS19199@dastard> <20151113090840.GA16423@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56465643.5070504@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:29:39PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 11/13/15 3:08 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 07:12:31AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 08:58:01AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> I think the problem here is simply that our interfaces suck.
> >>> xfs_trans_roll really needs to rejoin any inode to the new transaction
> >>> to that was joined to the previous one.  Once we've fixed that we can
> >>> get rid of the silly committed arguments and everyone will be happy.
> >>
> >> xfs_trans_roll is not specifically for rolling transactions with
> >> locked inodes in them. We could use it for any object that needs
> >> multiple transactions to modify. e.g. we could roll transactions
> >> across an AGF (using hold+join) so that it remains locked across
> >> multiple allocation/free transactions.
> > 
> > xfs_trans_roll already logs the inode core, which requires the
> > inode to be attached to the transaction.  While I could see the
> > point of moving this out of the core __xfs_trans_roll into an
> > xfs_trans_roll_inode helper we might as well follow the current
> > interface for now.
> 
> Trying to follow you guys ;)
> 
> Something like this?

yes, something like that ;)

(better late than never!)

-Dave.

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index dbae649..d23bce8 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -91,32 +91,32 @@ xfs_zero_extent(
>   * last due to locking considerations.  We never free any extents in
>   * the first transaction.
>   *
> - * Return 1 if the given transaction was committed and a new one
> - * started, and 0 otherwise in the committed parameter.
> + * If an inode *ip is provided, rejoin it to the transaction if
> + * the transaction was committed.
>   */
>  int                                          /* error */
>  xfs_bmap_finish(
>       struct xfs_trans                **tp,   /* transaction pointer addr */
>       struct xfs_bmap_free            *flist, /* i/o: list extents to free */
> -     int                             *committed)/* xact committed or not */
> +     xfs_inode_t                     *ip)
>  {
>       struct xfs_efd_log_item         *efd;   /* extent free data */
>       struct xfs_efi_log_item         *efi;   /* extent free intention */
>       int                             error;  /* error return value */
> +     int                             committed;/* xact committed or not */
>       struct xfs_bmap_free_item       *free;  /* free extent item */
>       struct xfs_bmap_free_item       *next;  /* next item on free list */
>  
>       ASSERT((*tp)->t_flags & XFS_TRANS_PERM_LOG_RES);
> -     if (flist->xbf_count == 0) {
> -             *committed = 0;
> +     if (flist->xbf_count == 0)
>               return 0;
> -     }
> +
>       efi = xfs_trans_get_efi(*tp, flist->xbf_count);
>       for (free = flist->xbf_first; free; free = free->xbfi_next)
>               xfs_trans_log_efi_extent(*tp, efi, free->xbfi_startblock,
>                       free->xbfi_blockcount);
>  
> -     error = __xfs_trans_roll(tp, NULL, committed);
> +     error = __xfs_trans_roll(tp, ip, &committed);
>       if (error) {
>               /*
>                * If the transaction was committed, drop the EFD reference
> @@ -128,16 +128,13 @@ xfs_bmap_finish(
>                * transaction so we should return committed=1 even though we're
>                * returning an error.
>                */
> -             if (*committed) {
> +             if (committed) {
>                       xfs_efi_release(efi);
>                       xfs_force_shutdown((*tp)->t_mountp,
>                               (error == -EFSCORRUPTED) ?
>                                       SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE :
>                                       SHUTDOWN_META_IO_ERROR);
> -             } else {
> -                     *committed = 1;
>               }
> -
>               return error;
>       }
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
> 

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: create helper for bmap finish & trans join in attr code, Dave Chinner <=