On 12/21/15 1:37 PM, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:48:31PM -0600, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>>> I'd like to know the current state of ext4 auto_da_alloc-like workarounds
>>> in XFS,
>>> particularly for RHEL7. Considering the two cases in
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ext4#Delayed_allocation_and_potential_data_loss
>>> is XFS behaving the same as ext4, both mounted with default options?
>>
>> The sync-on-close-after-file-got-truncated case has been handled since 2007;
>> see
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git/commit/?id=ba87ea699ebd9dd577bf055ebc4a98200e337542
>>
>> The sync-after-rename behavior was suggested and rejected for xfs, see
>>
>> http://marc.info/?t=139845506300002&r=1&w=2
>>
>> If you'd like to add this information to the XFS wiki, please do so!
>
> Thanks, this is an exemplary answer, not to mention lightning fast as well!
>
> I would consider if Wiki had at
> http://xfs.org/index.php/Special:RequestAccount page:
> * Privacy policy http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS.org:Privacy_policy
> * Terms of Service
> http://xfs.org/index.php?title=XFS.org:Terms_of_Service&action=edit&redlink=1
>
> The latter being something I must read and agree on before I can request a
> user
> account.
Hohum...
Russell, can you either remove the requirement for reading a nonexistent page,
or
add that page?
Thanks,
-Eric
> BR,
>
|