Re: Ideas on unified real-ro mount option across all filesystems

["Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2015-12-17 04:26, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:15:59PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:

>> I have always interpreted it as simply "no user changes to the
>> filesystem," and that is clearly what the vfs does with the
>> flag...
> 
> That ("-o ro means no user changes") has always been my
> understanding too.  You /want/ the FS to replay the journal on an
> RO mount so that regular FS operation picks up the committed
> transactions.
> 
> --D

That's my understanding, too, but after some point in time, not
initially. It was explained to me some years ago after I found out
that a disk image mounted read only was modified. The trick was to
make the image '-w'.

I also have the vague feeling that once (years ago) I found a problem
when a mount failed or crashed when the image was ro.


Just a user view on this :-)

- -- 
Cheers / Saludos,

                Carlos E. R.
                (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlZyzYkACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VDNwCfehM5NHMAgZuuzLf99kKulLKI
AkAAnjt4mZngHZdH5v60T+P6tnnFzUiO
=Pw+f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----