Re: Ideas on unified real-ro mount option across all filesystems

["Carlos E. R." <carlos.e.r@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2015-12-17 04:26, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:15:59PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:


>> I have always interpreted it as simply "no user changes to the
>> filesystem," and that is clearly what the vfs does with the
>> flag...
> 
> That ("-o ro means no user changes") has always been my
> understanding too.  You /want/ the FS to replay the journal on an
> RO mount so that regular FS operation picks up the committed
> transactions.

That's my understanding, too, but after some point in time. It was
explained to me some years ago after I found out that a disk image
mounted read only was modified. The trick was to make the image '-w'.

I have the vague feeling that once I found a problem when a mount
failed or crashed when the image was ro.


Just a user view on this :-)

- -- 
Cheers / Saludos,

                Carlos E. R.
                (from 13.1 x86_64 "Bottle" at Telcontar)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlZyyBsACgkQtTMYHG2NR9VDYACfRd6Zzd60JzX6LoW1F2K4fSai
OJAAoJXgLlcrlFZy1U2MzCBaQ4cz0EmP
=s8oq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----