Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:14:29AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either
> > the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone
> > behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring.  I didn't have
> > time to look into why it's failing yet.
> 
> Huh.  Works reliably for /me; could you send me the output from 849?

--- tests/generic/849.out       2015-12-09 15:31:50.492879152 +0000
+++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/849.out.bad 2015-12-11
00:02:25.154347175 +0000
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 QA output created by 849
 Create the original files
 f4820540fc0ac02750739896fe028d56  TEST_DIR/test-849/file1
-dc881c004745c49f7f4e9cc766f57bc8  TEST_DIR/test-849/file2
+eb34153e9ed1e774db28cbbe4090a449  TEST_DIR/test-849/file2
 dc881c004745c49f7f4e9cc766f57bc8  TEST_DIR/test-849/file2.chk
 Compare against check files
+file2 and file2.chk do not match