xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version

To: "aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:50:53 -0500
Cc: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <565706BB.3030006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5656DD39.8060403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151126132638.53ed9fc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <565706BB.3030006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 02:18:51PM +0100, aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Yes I used -f option with 4.X version of xfsprogs but mounting the
> volume was not possible - before mkfs.xfs finished successfully
> (mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0,finobt=0).
> 

You posted the output associated with the crc=1 fs mount failure, what
happens when you try to mount after formatting with crc=0?

Brian

> Should I stay in 3.1.X family of xfsprogs or is it recommended to use at
> least 3.2.x version with kernel 3.10?
> 
> The most I care about xfs_repair.
> 
> On 11/26/15 13:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> > Le Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:21:45 +0100
> > "aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> écrivait:
> > 
> >> mkfs.xfs -m crc=0,finobt=0
> >>
> >> but it does not work with 4.X version of xfsprogs. Call trace also
> >> occurred so I tried to use 3.2.4 family with crc=0,finobt=0 and volume
> >> mounted successfully.
> >>
> > 
> > Did you use -f? else mkfs.xfs won't do anything as it'll detect an
> > existing filesystem.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>