xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version

To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Which xfsprogs version to which kernel version
From: "aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:18:51 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20151126132638.53ed9fc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5656DD39.8060403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20151126132638.53ed9fc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
Yes I used -f option with 4.X version of xfsprogs but mounting the
volume was not possible - before mkfs.xfs finished successfully
(mkfs.xfs -f -m crc=0,finobt=0).

Should I stay in 3.1.X family of xfsprogs or is it recommended to use at
least 3.2.x version with kernel 3.10?

The most I care about xfs_repair.

On 11/26/15 13:26, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
> Le Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:21:45 +0100
> "aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aluno3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Ãcrivait:
> 
>> mkfs.xfs -m crc=0,finobt=0
>>
>> but it does not work with 4.X version of xfsprogs. Call trace also
>> occurred so I tried to use 3.2.4 family with crc=0,finobt=0 and volume
>> mounted successfully.
>>
> 
> Did you use -f? else mkfs.xfs won't do anything as it'll detect an
> existing filesystem.
> 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>