xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#804255: Please update initramfs in postinst

To: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Bug#804255: Please update initramfs in postinst
From: Steve McIntyre <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:41:15 +0000
Cc: 804255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1822095565.6959319.1447027220334.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20151106161941.15248.86048.reportbug@xxxxxxxxxx> <1822095565.6959319.1447027220334.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Steve McIntyre <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>, 804255@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: XFS Development Team <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:45:02 +0000
Resent-from: Steve McIntyre <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.804255.B804255.144717373620517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Control: tag -1 +patch

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 07:00:20PM -0500, Nathan Scott wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>----- Original Message -----
>> Package: xfsprogs
>> Version: 3.2.1
>> Severity: important
>> Tags: d-i
>> 
>> To make this work well, all filesystem tools packages for filesystems
>> that are likely to be used for / and/or /usr should call
>> "update-initramfs -u" in their postinst. This will
>
>OK.
>
>> I've checked your package and I don't see any update-initramfs
>> calls.
>
>(yep, xfsprogs has no postinst at all IIRC)
>
>> Please add one. If you'd like help doing that postinst work, I
>> can supply a patch - just ask!
>
>That would be great, if you don't mind Steve?  Many thanks!

Here's a debdiff of what I've just built. Ignore the NMU version in
the changelog...

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@xxxxxxxxxx
The two hard things in computing:
 * naming things
 * cache invalidation
 * off-by-one errors                  -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen

Attachment: xfsprogs_4.2.0.1.debdiff
Description: Text document

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>