xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: upfront block zeroing for DAX

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 V2] xfs: upfront block zeroing for DAX
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:48:27 -0700
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1445225238-30413-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1445225238-30413-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:27:12PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> This is an updated patch set that was first posted here:
> 
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2015-10/msg00006.html
> 
> I've dropped the DAX locking revert patch from it; that's on it's
> way to Linus via other channels and is essentially independent to
> this set of XFS changes.
> 
> The only real change in the XFS code between the two versions is the
> addition of XFS_TRANS_RESERVE in the DAX path in
> xfs_iomap_write_direct() to allow it to dip into the reserve block
> pool for unwritten extent conversion rather than reporting ENOSPC.
> 
> Patches are against 4.3-rc5 + XFS for-next branch.
> 
> -Dave.

Hey Dave,

I was going to start testing these, but I'm having trouble finding a baseline
where they apply cleanly.  It looks like xfs/for-next already contains v1 of
the series, and they don't seem to apply cleanly to the current
xfs/xfs-misc-fixes-for-4.4-2 nor to v4.3.  The xfs repo I'm looking at is
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dgc/linux-xfs.git

What am I missing?

Thanks,
- Ross

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>