xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/7] xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] xfs: Don't use unwritten extents for DAX
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:15:30 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1446435735-1526-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1446435735-1526-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1446435735-1526-4-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 02:42:11PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> DAX has a page fault serialisation problem with block allocation.
> Because it allows concurrent page faults and does not have a page
> lock to serialise faults to the same page, it can get two concurrent
> faults to the page that race.
> 
> When two read faults race, this isn't a huge problem as the data
> underlying the page is not changing and so "detect and drop" works
> just fine. The issues are to do with write faults.
> 
> When two write faults occur, we serialise block allocation in
> get_blocks() so only one faul will allocate the extent. It will,
> however, be marked as an unwritten extent, and that is where the
> problem lies - the DAX fault code cannot differentiate between a
> block that was just allocated and a block that was preallocated and
> needs zeroing. The result is that both write faults end up zeroing
> the block and attempting to convert it back to written.
> 
> The problem is that the first fault can zero and convert before the
> second fault starts zeroing, resulting in the zeroing for the second
> fault overwriting the data that the first fault wrote with zeros.
> The second fault then attempts to convert the unwritten extent,
> which is then a no-op because it's already written. Data loss occurs
> as a result of this race.
> 
> Because there is no sane locking construct in the page fault code
> that we can use for serialisation across the page faults, we need to
> ensure block allocation and zeroing occurs atomically in the
> filesystem. This means we can still take concurrent page faults and
> the only time they will serialise is in the filesystem
> mapping/allocation callback. The page fault code will always see
> written, initialised extents, so we will be able to remove the
> unwritten extent handling from the DAX code when all filesystems are
> converted.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

I'm still not convinced that block zeroing is the right thing to do for
DAX/dio (re: the discussion on the previous version), but the code looks
fine to me and we should be able to easily optimize this in a separate
patch if warranted:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  fs/dax.c           |  5 +++++
>  fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c  | 13 +++++++++----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index a86d3cc..131fd35a 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,11 @@
>  #include <linux/uio.h>
>  #include <linux/vmstat.h>
>  
> +/*
> + * dax_clear_blocks() is called from within transaction context from XFS,
> + * and hence this means the stack from this point must follow GFP_NOFS
> + * semantics for all operations.
> + */
>  int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long size)
>  {
>       struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 366e41eb..7b4f849 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> @@ -1293,15 +1293,12 @@ xfs_map_direct(
>  
>       trace_xfs_gbmap_direct(XFS_I(inode), offset, size, type, imap);
>  
> -     /* XXX: preparation for removing unwritten extents in DAX */
> -#if 0
>       if (dax_fault) {
>               ASSERT(type == XFS_IO_OVERWRITE);
>               trace_xfs_gbmap_direct_none(XFS_I(inode), offset, size, type,
>                                           imap);
>               return;
>       }
> -#endif
>  
>       if (bh_result->b_private) {
>               ioend = bh_result->b_private;
> @@ -1429,10 +1426,12 @@ __xfs_get_blocks(
>       if (error)
>               goto out_unlock;
>  
> +     /* for DAX, we convert unwritten extents directly */
>       if (create &&
>           (!nimaps ||
>            (imap.br_startblock == HOLESTARTBLOCK ||
> -           imap.br_startblock == DELAYSTARTBLOCK))) {
> +           imap.br_startblock == DELAYSTARTBLOCK) ||
> +          (IS_DAX(inode) && ISUNWRITTEN(&imap)))) {
>               if (direct || xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
>                       /*
>                        * xfs_iomap_write_direct() expects the shared lock. It
> @@ -1477,6 +1476,12 @@ __xfs_get_blocks(
>               goto out_unlock;
>       }
>  
> +     if (IS_DAX(inode) && create) {
> +             ASSERT(!ISUNWRITTEN(&imap));
> +             /* zeroing is not needed at a higher layer */
> +             new = 0;
> +     }
> +
>       /* trim mapping down to size requested */
>       if (direct || size > (1 << inode->i_blkbits))
>               xfs_map_trim_size(inode, iblock, bh_result,
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> index c3cb5a5..f4f5b43 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
>       int             committed;
>       int             error;
>       int             lockmode;
> +     int             bmapi_flags = XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC;
>  
>       rt = XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip);
>       extsz = xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip);
> @@ -195,6 +196,23 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
>        * Allocate and setup the transaction
>        */
>       tp = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, XFS_TRANS_DIOSTRAT);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * For DAX, we do not allocate unwritten extents, but instead we zero
> +      * the block before we commit the transaction.  Ideally we'd like to do
> +      * this outside the transaction context, but if we commit and then crash
> +      * we may not have zeroed the blocks and this will be exposed on
> +      * recovery of the allocation. Hence we must zero before commit.
> +      * Further, if we are mapping unwritten extents here, we need to zero
> +      * and convert them to written so that we don't need an unwritten extent
> +      * callback for DAX. This also means that we need to be able to dip into
> +      * the reserve block pool if there is no space left but we need to do
> +      * unwritten extent conversion.
> +      */
> +     if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip))) {
> +             bmapi_flags = XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT | XFS_BMAPI_ZERO;
> +             tp->t_flags |= XFS_TRANS_RESERVE;
> +     }
>       error = xfs_trans_reserve(tp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write,
>                                 resblks, resrtextents);
>       /*
> @@ -221,7 +239,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
>       xfs_bmap_init(&free_list, &firstfsb);
>       nimaps = 1;
>       error = xfs_bmapi_write(tp, ip, offset_fsb, count_fsb,
> -                             XFS_BMAPI_PREALLOC, &firstfsb, resblks, imap,
> +                             bmapi_flags, &firstfsb, resblks, imap,
>                               &nimaps, &free_list);
>       if (error)
>               goto out_bmap_cancel;
> @@ -232,6 +250,7 @@ xfs_iomap_write_direct(
>       error = xfs_bmap_finish(&tp, &free_list, &committed);
>       if (error)
>               goto out_bmap_cancel;
> +
>       error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
>       if (error)
>               goto out_unlock;
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>